balancing traditional and contemporary norms
The region https://asianbrides.org/kazakhstan-women/ has become the subject of a heated debate over" Asian values" as a result of Asian countries ' economic successes, which are frequently achieved using quite different methods than those of the West. The alleged uniformity of Eastern economic models, political ideals, and social practices, as well as the responsibility of historical factors in East Asia's emergence as an worldwide power, have been the main topics of discussion in this debate.
An indignant belligerence by East Asians has always been a consistent answer to these criticisms. The characterizations of their societies that have emerged in the process are not flattering: they are said to be self- reliant, already miraculously communitarian, centered on individual relationships and mutual obligation rather than cold letter of the law – even though the latter is called upon to enforce those values https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1085&context=honors, respectful of hierarchy and authority, and state interventionist, often into the private space of individuals.
This defensiveness is a natural reaction to the fact that the affected societies are experiencing an unprecedented level of change as a result of globalizing forces. The heart of this discussion is, however, the way in which these societies are trying to create norms of governance and social organization that will be viewed as legitimate by their citizens.
This is happening at the local level, in public forums, in local government, and in their local social and religious institutions. In my informal poll of respondents in 1994 and 1996, I think it's because the majority of Asians place an emphasis on maintaining an organized society even at the expense of some individual freedoms.
